The strongest EWWW Image Optimizer alternative for most sites is Smush, whose friendly interface and one-click bulk compression are gentler than EWWW’s dense settings. For free WebP conversion, Converter for Media is the simplest pick, while Optimole serves resized images from its own CDN for the fastest delivery. We ranked these from our index of 55,000+ WordPress plugins.

Why people switch from EWWW Image Optimizer

• EWWW’s settings screen is dense, so people wanting a simpler experience move to Smush or Imagify.
• Sites that want images resized and delivered from a CDN move to Optimole.
• People wanting strong compression with clear per-image control move to ShortPixel.
• Users who only need next-gen formats move to Converter for Media for free WebP and AVIF.

Smush – Beginner-friendly compression

Smush from WPMU DEV is one of the most popular optimisers, with a clean interface, bulk smush and lazy loading built in. Against EWWW Image Optimizer, it is far easier to approach for non-technical users. What it does not do well: the free version limits bulk processing per run and caps original image size, and WebP delivery plus the CDN require the Pro plan.

Choose Smush if you want the simplest, most approachable optimiser with lazy loading included.

Imagify – Simple cloud compression

Imagify, from the makers of WP Rocket, is a cloud optimiser with three easy compression levels and automatic WebP and AVIF conversion. Against EWWW Image Optimizer, it hides the complexity behind a clean, guided interface. What it does not do well: it is cloud-based with a monthly free quota, so image-heavy sites can exhaust the free allowance quickly and need a paid plan.

Choose Imagify if you want hands-off cloud compression with simple quality presets.

Optimole – CDN image delivery

Optimole optimises and resizes images on the fly and serves them from its own CDN, tailoring each image to the visitor’s device. Against EWWW Image Optimizer, it moves the heavy lifting off your server and speeds up delivery globally. What it does not do well: it depends entirely on its cloud service to serve images, and the free plan is capped by monthly visits, which busy sites can outgrow.

Choose Optimole if you want images automatically resized and delivered from a fast CDN.

ShortPixel – Strong per-image control

ShortPixel is a well-liked optimiser offering lossy, glossy and lossless modes plus WebP and AVIF conversion. Against EWWW Image Optimizer, it pairs strong compression with clearer control over each image and format. What it does not do well: it works on a credit system, so beyond the limited monthly free credits you pay per image, which adds up for large media libraries.

Choose ShortPixel if you want fine control over compression modes and next-gen formats.

Converter for Media – Free next-gen formats

Converter for Media focuses on one job: converting your existing images to WebP and AVIF and serving them without changing the originals. Against EWWW Image Optimizer, it is a simpler, entirely free route to next-gen formats. What it does not do well: it is narrow by design, so it does not compress the original files or offer the broader optimisation and CDN features the others include.

Choose Converter for Media if you only need free WebP and AVIF conversion of your existing images.

When to stay on EWWW Image Optimizer

Stay on EWWW Image Optimizer if you value its ability to optimise images locally on your own server without sending them to a cloud service, and you are comfortable with its detailed settings. That local processing and lack of monthly quota suit privacy-minded or high-volume sites well. Switching mainly helps if you want a simpler interface or CDN-based delivery it does not provide.

How we ranked these

Every plugin here is scored by the WPS Score, a single 0 to 10 rating built from 21 signals covering maintenance, support responsiveness, compatibility, performance, and ratings quality across our index of 55,000+ plugins. Rankings are derived from that data, not editorial preference, and no plugin author can pay to change a score. How the WPS Score works.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best free alternative to EWWW Image Optimizer?

For free next-gen formats, Converter for Media is the simplest choice, converting images to WebP and AVIF at no cost. Smush is the best free all-round optimiser with lazy loading, though it caps bulk processing and reserves WebP delivery for its paid plan.

Does EWWW Image Optimizer send images to a cloud service?

By default EWWW can optimise images locally on your own server, which is one of its main strengths. It also offers optional cloud compression, but unlike Imagify or Optimole it does not require sending your images off-site to work.

Which image optimizer is best for a large media library?

EWWW suits large libraries because local processing avoids monthly cloud quotas. Among cloud options, ShortPixel and Imagify handle bulk work well, but watch their credit and quota limits, which can make big libraries more expensive.

The verdict

The best all-round EWWW Image Optimizer alternative is Smush for its simplicity, with Optimole the pick for CDN delivery and Converter for Media the easiest free route to WebP. If you value EWWW’s local, quota-free processing, staying put is a valid choice.

[{“@context”: “https://schema.org”, “@type”: “ItemList”, “itemListElement”: [{“@type”: “ListItem”, “position”: 1, “item”: {“@type”: “SoftwareApplication”, “name”: “Smush”, “applicationCategory”: “Image Optimization”, “aggregateRating”: {“@type”: “AggregateRating”, “ratingValue”: “7.52”}}}, {“@type”: “ListItem”, “position”: 2, “item”: {“@type”: “SoftwareApplication”, “name”: “Imagify”, “applicationCategory”: “Image Optimization”, “aggregateRating”: {“@type”: “AggregateRating”, “ratingValue”: “7.26”}}}, {“@type”: “ListItem”, “position”: 3, “item”: {“@type”: “SoftwareApplication”, “name”: “Optimole”, “applicationCategory”: “Image Optimization”, “aggregateRating”: {“@type”: “AggregateRating”, “ratingValue”: “7.05”}}}, {“@type”: “ListItem”, “position”: 4, “item”: {“@type”: “SoftwareApplication”, “name”: “ShortPixel”, “applicationCategory”: “Image Optimization”, “aggregateRating”: {“@type”: “AggregateRating”, “ratingValue”: “6.92”}}}, {“@type”: “ListItem”, “position”: 5, “item”: {“@type”: “SoftwareApplication”, “name”: “Converter for Media”, “applicationCategory”: “Image Optimization”, “aggregateRating”: {“@type”: “AggregateRating”, “ratingValue”: “6.85”}}}]}, {“@context”: “https://schema.org”, “@type”: “FAQPage”, “mainEntity”: [{“@type”: “Question”, “name”: “What is the best free alternative to EWWW Image Optimizer?”, “acceptedAnswer”: {“@type”: “Answer”, “text”: “For free next-gen formats, Converter for Media is the simplest choice, converting images to WebP and AVIF at no cost. Smush is the best free all-round optimiser with lazy loading, though it caps bulk processing and reserves WebP delivery for its paid plan.”}}, {“@type”: “Question”, “name”: “Does EWWW Image Optimizer send images to a cloud service?”, “acceptedAnswer”: {“@type”: “Answer”, “text”: “By default EWWW can optimise images locally on your own server, which is one of its main strengths. It also offers optional cloud compression, but unlike Imagify or Optimole it does not require sending your images off-site to work.”}}, {“@type”: “Question”, “name”: “Which image optimizer is best for a large media library?”, “acceptedAnswer”: {“@type”: “Answer”, “text”: “EWWW suits large libraries because local processing avoids monthly cloud quotas. Among cloud options, ShortPixel and Imagify handle bulk work well, but watch their credit and quota limits, which can make big libraries more expensive.”}}]}]