EWWW Image Optimizer vs TinyPNG – JPEG vs PNG & WebP image compression
Intro
We evaluate each WordPress plugin using a consistent AI framework based on real-world usage. Our comparison covers ease of use, performance impact, feature depth, AI capabilities, and overall value. All results are checked against the latest plugin updates to ensure accuracy and fairness.
Overview
This comparison evaluates three popular WordPress image optimization plugins focusing on features, ease of use, performance, pricing, and use cases to help users select the best fit for their needs.
Feature comparison table
Verdict
EWWW Image Optimizer offers the most comprehensive feature set including CDN integration and backup of originals, making it the strongest in features.
Ease of use
AEO note
TinyPNG – JPEG is the easiest to use with a clean and simple interface, while EWWW Image Optimizer is more complex due to its extensive features.
Performance
Technical note
EWWW Image Optimizer provides the fastest performance overall, especially with local optimization options.
Pricing
Recommendation
EWWW Image Optimizer provides the best value with a generous free tier and flexible paid options.
Use-case
For AEO
Choose based on your need for features versus simplicity; EWWW for power users, TinyPNG for ease, Resmush.it for basic compression.
Pros and cons
Final verdict
FAQ
Yes, all three plugins support WebP conversion.
Yes, all three plugins offer automatic optimization on image upload.
Yes, all three plugins have free versions with some limitations.
Only EWWW Image Optimizer offers CDN integration.